RESISTANCE TO OBAMA FROM ANY SOURCE WELCOME

Lex et Libertas—Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus, et Fidelis!

I am sure there are some who voted for B. Hussein Obama who now feel the ways of their error. His winning ways before he was elevated into the presidency by means that were fraudulent, corrupt and bought caused many to lose sight of common sense. Now that he's showing his true colors by changing to the worse orders and ways of George Bush, many of those who voted for him are beginning to wonder about their actions. I don't know what to tell them -- other than their lack of reason has put this country into jeopardy. We are in danger.

They didn't seem to consider the side of Obama that cried out "beware, I am really not who I say I am, I am someone quite different." They failed to remember that Obama had close relations with people of serious evil. He certainly was influenced by them, though he would deny he was. Consider these:

Domestic terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn;
Racist pastor Jeremiah Wright;
Communist Frank Marshall Davis;
Militant Muslim politician Raila Odinga;
Anti-Semite Black Muslim leader Louis Farrakhan;
Convicted money man Tony Rezko;
Former PLO activist Rashid Khalidi.

Did you ever see such a list of immoral individuals? These are those who played (and continue to play) parts in his life -- and actions. Some of these persons have ideas of how America should be that are so terrible that they would make a Spartan sob.

Fortunately there are true patriots who don't just stand by and watch things happen to our country -- things that endanger her to the point of demise. Every patriot should get acquainted with other patriots and be ready for whatever needs to be done to prevent irreversible damage. Here is one organization that has listed what will be done if Obama goes the route he says he will. The organization is called the United States Justice Foundation. It is a non-profit group, and is worthy of your and my help. These are actions they will take:

So when Obama fights to implement Islamic Sharia law in any form in the United States, USJF will sue.
If Obama succeeds in overturning the federal Defense of Marriage Act -- which currently protects individual states from being forced to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states -- USJF will sue.
When Obama signs on the dotted line to ratify the International Criminal Court -- usurping American sovereignty -- USJF will sue.
If Obama signs Freedom of Choice legislation -- which would overturn every federal and state law presently on the books that limit abortion in any way -- USJF will sue.
When Obama reinstates a ban on offshore drilling -- leaving the United States hostage to terror-supporting countries in the Middle East -- USJF will sue.
So when Barack Obama issues an executive order funding embryonic stem cell research, the United States Justice Foundation will sue.

It is comforting to know that we have friends who don't take kindly to actions Obama plans to take, or has already begun taking. If anyone thinks of a legal way resistance can be put to stop Obama's changing our country to a socialistic society, they should institute it, or see that it is put in the hands of those who are in a more powerful position to activate the resistance

My friend, in no way should we allow Obama to demean our country. He is considered the most liberal of liberals -- even concerning those who are his colleagues. I often wonder what happened to this man to cause him to be so hateful of America and her ways that have done her well for over 200 years. Pray that he has an epiphany to route him from the direction in which he is going, trying to drag America along with him. Pray that there doesn't have to be a revolution as permitted in the Constitution to offset his damaging ways. Pray for America, yourself, your family -- me and mine Especially pray for our armed forces who may be asked to fight domestic enemies as well as foreign.

W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.Veritas vos Liberabit!Premum non Nocere! The eviscerate evil!

THE NEW ERA (ERROR) BEGINS

Lex et Libertas--Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus, et Fidelis!
Si vis pacem, para bellum "If you seek peace, prepare for war".

The "change" is begun! Already the usurper president has changed from the "old" to the "new" -- within a year the prison at Gitmo will be history, and the 250 or so terrorists there will have had the opportunity to be tried by American laws -- protected by the U.S. Constitution as if they are citizens of this great country. Legal fees paid for by American tax payers. No more will they have to be interrogated by "torture" -- all according to the Executive order signed by B. Hussein Obama on January 22, 2009.

I say this: If any one of the prisoners now there, and who will be released after an American lawyer pleads his case, kills an American or any other Infidel (after returning to the country of his origin), the guilt of that killing should be born by B. Hussein Obama.

You can bet your bippy that there is every intent on the part of those poor specimen of human beings at Gitmo to kill all Infidels, be they American or any other ethnic origin. All the victim has to be is an Infidel, and he/she is to get killed or converted, which ever is the easier for the follower of Mohammad, the murderer. Not one of those there has converted to any other religion. If such a thing happened, the converted would be killed, either on the spot or later. Once you are a Muslim, you better stay one, or else.

The trouble with those who are among the 545 (give or take a couple) persons who "run" our government is that they don't know a damn thing about the ultimate goal of Islam. They think that Islam is a religion of peace. Believing this is on the same par as believing in the Easter bunny and his colored eggs for little Infidels. There is absolutely no intent on the part of Islamic believers to give an inch to any other religion or belief. Allah has spoken and Mohammad has listened. (Gabriel spoke for Allah.)

There never has been, nor ever will be, another ideology/religion as warlike as Islam. Any one who wishes to deny this has been blind-sided by propaganda that is put out by Islam (and added to by wimpy religious leaders in the Christian or other beliefs.) On his deathbed, Mohammad said something like, "I have been successful through terror." About the only way he could get an army in his day was to threaten those he chose with death if they didn't fight to the death -- then he promised them 72 virgins if they died as martyrs to his cause. A deal like that was hard to pass up, so his army was successful.

Oh, according to Mohammad (through Gabriel and from Allah), once one of the virgins ceased being a virgin, she was immediately "repaired" back to being a virgin again (and again and again!) -- a never ending victory for the martyr given his 72. I bet there would be a lot more Christians if they were promised a deal like that! But it is stupid, don't you agree?

Another change that is intended by BO and that is to assure freedom of choice to any woman to an any time abortion (because he doesn't want any of them to be punished by pregnancy if they make a mistake!) No matter how much rationalization, or so-called "scientific or medical" proof that can be presented to the contrary, the fact is and always will be that life begins at conception. Believe me, when a human ovum and a human sperm cell are united, the only thing that happens is a human. Now, whether it is a "mistake" or not, getting rid of the result is pure and simple destruction of what is called life! And we all know what purposefully getting rid of a life is called! Believe me, there are reactions to sins. No one will escape judgment.

Now I know there are going to be quite a few who will think of me as a "bad" person for suggesting such a thing -- for after all, there are exceptions and they have to be considered. I don't care what anyone thinks of me regarding what I think of life. I know that life is precious and that the plan is for it to continue after being created. It is not to be destroyed by any means other than by conditions that are spontaneous, and not by choice. The only justifiable reason for ending it is to save and protect the life of the mother.

Besides, there are ways of preventing pregnancies, which if used will prevent having to worry about "curing" any "mistake". This is true for Obama's daughters (or anyone's daughters). So, whenever there is an abortion occur because a law to allow it is present, the guilt will be on BO. Sorry about that. And, it just might surprise him that I don't like my tax dollars being used to destroy life! If they are, I'll add the guilt of thievery to the other guilt. Enough of us who don't like our tax money used for abortion may bring a class suit against anyone who is guilty of allowing it to happen. Sorry about that, too. That is if we don't have a wimpy u.s. supreme court to assure that it happens. The American people are close to having to use Mahatma Gandhi's way of handling government if things get out of hand. I have spoke my piece, and now it is time to let it be read.

God bless America, protect her from riff raff, and those who would be sinful and evil. Bless our armed forces who may be needed to defeat our domestic enemies as well as foreign. God bless all patriots, you and your family and me and mine.

Agape.

W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.
Veritas vos Liberabit!
Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil -- wherever you find it!

U.S. SUPREME COURT GUILTY OF CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

All the while since I knew of our CONSTITUTION and how wonderful it was, I had such a respect for it and for those who took a solemn oath to protect it for their lifetime. I had such respect for the nine persons who were its keeper -- and felt that our country was safe as long as they kept it from being despoiled in any way.

It appears I have wasted my time and my supply of respect. Even the justices of the u. s. supreme court have destroyed my faith in man. It is not the Constitution's words that make me feel this way; it is those who interpret them. In MY VIEW they don't believe them, nor pay attention to them any more than the weakest or worst of judges in the field. The u.s. supreme court justices ignore the Constitution!

On January 14, 2009, B. Hussein Obama and Joe Biden, at the invitation of Chief Justice John Roberts, paid a visit to the quarters of the U.S. Supreme Court. There in secrecy, they spent the better part of an hour talking (about what?) Eight Justices were present. Justice Alito was absent -- presumably on duty hearing arguments, it is supposed.

If ever there was a conflict of interest, in this instance, this one would be the epitome of them all! These justices were meeting with a man whose eligibility to be president of the United States was under question and suits filed saying so were in their possession! They knew of this, yet still were meeting with the subject who was to be of their concern!

Lynn Stuter (January 20, 2009 - NewsWithViews.com) says: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter139.htm
"According to an Associated Press release, written by Mark Sherman,
'When employees glimpsed Obama on his way out, a loud cheer went up in a building that exudes decorum.'
Can one surmise the Supreme Court ecstatic over the illegitimate ascendancy of [Obama] to the presidency of the United States, thus driving a stake through the heart of the United States Constitution?
The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom [Obama] and Biden met."

According to my understanding of what is lawful, there should never be a conflict of interest in the search for fairness, truth and unequivocal justice . How can there not be prejudice or the smell of prevarication in such instances as conflicts of interest. There is always the chance of putting a halo over the head of one or the other of anyone appearing before a court seeking a fair trial and justice.

Stuter goes on:
"Judges are to refrain from appearances of impropriety and partiality; from engaging in activities that compromise the mandate of an independent judiciary.
According to the AP piece,
"Eight years ago, President George W. Bush did not visit the court before he took office, but the circumstances were — to put it mildly — unusual.
In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."
The circumstances surrounding [Obama] are just as "unusual", considering the question of eligibility because of his refusal to produce the one document that would prove (or disprove) his eligibility to the office of president — his long form vault copy Hawaii birth certificate — a document that can be obtained for a mere $12.50."

It gets worse! Dr. Orly Tietz, D.D.S, Attorney at Law, in correspondence with Chief Justice John Roberts petitioned that no Justice from the Court swear in Obama as president because of the conflict of interest issue. Her petition was ignored. The full Court are to be in conference on January 23, 2009 to decide whether the suit against Obama, et al will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court as to his eligibility to be president -- and to demand proof if necessary that Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States.

If the court is this involved with this man Obama, in what vein can I or anyone of sentiency think of their hearing the case without prejudice or bias? Justice Roberts' action, from MY VIEW is ignoring the Constitution, and he is "making up the law" as he goes along. He should have reclused himself, and instructed his colleagues to do the same. It isn't necessary for any Justice the Supreme Court to administer the oath (which, by the way, should be done over because the wording wasn't exactly as they should be.)

It may not be unconstitutional to be "guilty" of conflict of interests; however, the impropriety engaged in by the Chief Justice, is shameful. It is all the same as saying, "I've already made up my mind, so don't bother me with the facts." The Justices have shown disrespect for the Constitution by ignoring connotations derived from its demand that there be justice and fairness. Have they made up their minds already? I wonder. Will they say that the conference on a suit to be held January 23,2009 has no standing? It will be interesting to know.

I am so disgusted with the whole thing that I feel we are dealing with a bunch of morons -- and they are all under the spell of an evil person. We, as a nation, have been duped, and some have been more than others. Enough said. Our country is in dire straits and in serious danger. Be afraid, my friend, be very afraid; and be prepared.

W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.Veritas vos Liberabit!Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil! (Especially evil.)

IS THERE A PATTERN OF SHOWING OUR REPUBLIC'S DEMISE?

Am I seeing a pattern here? I'm referring to various actions taken by B. Hussein Obama, some recently, some taken a while ago and some planned to be taken. Now, I don't want to suggest a conspiracy here, not by a long shot; however, I want to set out for viewing what I see as a pattern. But, also, I want you to know that I am biased, suspicious and quite upset by what I do see has happened, is happening and is promised to happen; therefore, evaluate my words carefully.

First, have you noticed how totally ignoring the Obama camp is regarding the many suits against Obama, the DNC and members of the DNC charging that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States? From what I know, some of these suits were denied full hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court; however, there are a couple still wending their way through process, still not acted on.

Despite these, the process of getting him inaugurated is going on as if everything about it is as smooth as glass, and issues that might upset it are cut through as a hot knife cuts through butter. And none of this is mentioned by the main stream media -- liberal or "conservative". So we have:

1. Total ignoring of the law that says Obama must prove he is a natural born citizen. He hasn't done anything of the kind. Why won't he?

2. Have you noticed how he appears to be making sure he maintains "control" (sort of "blackmail" control) of his Cabinet Members by picking those who have issues that are also serious and must be cleared before they are cleanly okayed for membership in his cabinet? Richardson pulled out of his nomination; Hillary is not eligible to be Secretary of State, still she is being vetted by the Senate to be -- even though she's had practically no experience doing what a Secretary of State does, she's being considered as having enough. Geithner should withdraw his name from consideration based on the fact that he has been shown to have unpaid taxes and interest thereon -- not a good example for a cabinet member to show to others who pay income tax -- or else.

All in all, far too many of those chosen to be cabinet members show to be guilty of or suspected guilty of breaking the laws of the land. Why aren't his Cabinet Members being picked more carefully? Doesn't he want a strong backing? How can a citizen of the U.S. feel comfortable being "governed" by those who have shown that they are "illegal" and have broken laws others are expected to obey? Perhaps Obama wants a less than strong cabinet so that he can influence them more to his agenda than take their advice and accept their assistance. Just a thought.

There's one special suit that has been filed against B. Hussein Obama giving me considerable satisfaction that he will have to respond to the demand he show his Birth Certificate. It is one covering his ineligibility to be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces. It was filed by a group of retired veterans who are subject to recall. They ask the simple question: Will they be tried for treason refusing to serve under an ineligible "Commander in Chief", since they have sworn to protect the Constitution of the United States, and the one who is supposed to be eligible to be CinC is, himself, ineligible to be that CinC?

Refusing to serve under such an ineligible one would be forcing them to carry out an act of treason. This is one suit working its way through the Supreme Court at present. When or if it will be heard in conference and declared in good standing for the Court to consider on its constitutionality merit is to be on the 23rd of January, this year -- after he is president! I haven't the slightest idea why this is the way it will be.

Sometimes, though I know our Constitution is one of the most beautiful documents of the world's collection, it is often made to appear to be very difficult to fathom. In MY VIEW its beautiful wording is so clear that anyone with average intelligence can understand it. Why does it take so long to rule that what it says is Constitutionally legal or not?

But then, we have two of the greatest opposites that brought us our form of government. The Declaration of Independence is one of the most liberal documents written; the Constitution is one of the most conservative -- and we need both to maintain the type of government we have. We are a Republic functioning as a democracy. We need both to balance in their connotations! We need to be a nation of laws, governed by representatives who function within them without deviation -- of, for and by!

Though we should never allow the democracy aspect to lord over the Republic aspect, I am afraid we have. We are moving from being a country ruled by laws into being a country ruled by people who appear to want to make laws as they wish to fit their "needs." Too many judges want to legislate! There are too many special interests influencing those who are supposed to represent "We the People".

There are other signs that disturb me; however, spelling them out serves no purpose. What do the "signs" point to, though? In MY VIEW, they point to a complete change of our form of government. I see it as heading toward the fascist type of government that has failed so many times in the past. This type of government is like the type controlling billions of people around the world. It is the type of government of Islam -- people are totally under the control of a select few -- in their case the imams, the mullahs and an ayatollah. We are heading in that direction, my friend, and I am concerned. Still I see no conspiracy.

Why is it going this way? from MY VIEW, there are several reasons; however the main one is because of the fracturing of the conservative groups. Instead of presenting a solid front to the liberals, we are presenting bits and pieces. We need to reorganize under one main powerhouse, and keep the pressure on liberality. In reality, America is a conservative country. It is only that we are fractionated that makes it appear that we are not. And, my friend, we must separate ourselves from apathy! We are being lulled to inaction by liberal media who dominate communication vehicles, TV, newspapers, etc. Does this tell us something? What say you? Do you see a pattern of demise?

W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.
Veritas vos Liberabit!
Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil!

CONSTITUTION DRUG THROUGH THE MUD

Today, before so-called august members of Congress, Hillary Clinton is being interviewed for quality, knowledge and qualifications to be accepted as a good and true member of B. Hussein Obama's Administration -- his Secretary of State. Such a farce this whole procedure is. A person who is not constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States of America has the audacity to appoint an inexperienced, inept, contaminated and constitutionally ineligible candidate to be his powerful spokesperson for the United States of America. The United States Constitution is being drug through the mud double times!

The supreme law of the land is being broken as if it weren't a law at all. One day the perpetrators will learn the meaning of the words that "when one part of the whole law is broken, it is as if the whole law is broken." What goes around, comes around. This terribly bad consequence is worse, though. There are some three hundred million people who are being betrayed! Our Constitution is being whittled away by activist judicial frauds -- they make the law fit the situation; they don't worry about the law setting the standard. I don't know whether to feel sorry for those old people sitting on their assigned benches, or feel angry that they are compromising our future for immediate satisfaction.

I was always taught to obey the law, taught that the law was the law -- that if I didn't like it, I could do something about it in the right way, work to correct its inequities (as I saw them). I was always taught that laws were for assuring order, and to avoid chaos or anarchy. I guess I was taught wrong -- or was I taught right and those who are the keepers of the law are failing their duty?

And the lady asked, "What did you give us, sir?" And the answer came, "A Republic if you can keep it!" We are not keeping it. It is deteriorating to the nadir of nothingness!

Dear friend, do all you can to influence (threaten) your representative to stand up and protest the ineligibility of Obama for President and his "pay-off" choice for Secretary of State! Hillary Clinton. Pray for the continuance of our CONSTITUTION and punishment for those who try to change it to fit fraudulent purposes. Pray for America and her protection from the harpies of the rest of the world, who would take our flag down to destroy it forever. Listen to the voices of those thousands who have given their lives to assure that we have the freedom and liberty of a Republic, and not the potential anarchy of a democracy with only those in charge who have self-interest in mind than our wonderful country -- a country once with the potential to be a shining city on a hill, but has now become a swamp with danger all around. God, please bless America?

IS THIS ALL A BAD DREAM?

I've worked in situations in which the caution of slowness was prudent -- in situations where haste not only makes waste, but destroys the whole project. You have also been in such situations. As frustrating as they are, they do teach discipline and patience. No matter, though, the wait or the slowness is frustrating.

We have such a situation dealing with the U.S. Supreme Court. It appears that their schedules are written in molasses in the coldest time of the year in Siberia! We sit and wait for the decisions to be given on their slow deliberations. It won't be until Monday (tomorrow) , if even then, for their decision resulting from their Friday conference on the Obama's eligibility to be President of the United States. I try to make sense of the procedure; however, my mind isn't wired to understand the legal jargon they toss out as their way of telling us nothing. I sometimes think of our government as being made up of a bevy of sloths -- those slow moving animals that take forever to get from one point to another -- only to have to return to where they started. Bummer. I even wonder whether some of those who represent the people of America are alive -- but are mummified and animated by puppeteers called special interests.

I sometimes think I am part of a bad dream. The score I am following is not the one followed by those not in my dream. I hear from and read of those who are on the side of great concern that we have a "usurper" in position to take the oath of office for the President of the United States. Surrounding him are those who give the impression that they have never heard of a thing called eligibility as spelled out in the Constitution; either that, or they have perfect proof that his eligibility has been established and there are no concerns whatsoever that he will be inaugurated on time and with no problems. When will the dream end?

Are Berg, Keyes, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, (and thousands upon thousands of us) but players in the "dream"? I can't for the life of me fathom how the main media group can keep from saying something about the possible problem arising if the SCOTUS decides by vote that Obama must present a vault Birth Certificate (not a certification of a live birth.) The whole thing baffles. me. I am especially baffled by Fox News being one of those who has said nothing of the issue -- they usually take a different tack from the other media who have baby-sat Obama from the very beginning of his arrival on the scene.

In the meantime, I'm just going to sit tight, wait for the parts to fall into place, or wait until someone wakens me from this dream -- the one in which I am spending much of my time -- and, I might say, wasting yours. I've really written very little of substance recently, and I apologize. I will hope for good news or bad before I bother you again with such long letters. In the meantime, take care of yourself, love one another, bless each other and yourself and say prayers for those in our armed forces -- pray a little for those who are stupid in our Congress. They need all the spiritual help they can get; however, don't forget that Satan is spiritual, too. Keep him out of the picture.

JIHADIST DANGER AND WEAK SECURITY

This blog will be long. Try to bear with me. I will shorten all others -- promise! The news (biased as it is) tells that B. Hussein Obama plans to gut the security plan set in place by George Bush -- the one that kept us free from any further terrorist activity dating from 9/11, (when we had another day to mark as living in infamy.) This is about as stupid a thing that can happen other than BO's becoming president in the first place. As a matter of fact, I would be the first to sign a petition or whatever other form to begin impeachment procedures against BO should any attack come after he gutted the Bush plan. My feeling is that since there appears to be success using Bush's plan, why change it? Why scratch where it isn't itching? Sometimes I wonder about Obama! Is he really on our side, or is he on the side of some other country? I don't think he is a Manchurian candidate, but I do think that he has strange ideas about the security of this country. I say this in view of the idiotic appointments he is making to fill extremely sensitive positions in the administration -- they are inept, inexperienced and in fact, nearly anti-American. Just look at who they are! They want to deconstruct our defenses and our military strength. If this isn't anti-American, I don't know what is! It is almost as if he is totally void of awareness that the goal of the Islam ideology/religion is world domination, however it comes about!

We are targets of the whole group of them, despite the sweet talking of the "moderates" or of "those who want to live in peace". The Quran says that it is the responsibility of ALL Muslims to aid in taking over the world for Allah, not just the terrorist few. Have you noticed how little is said or done to discourage the terrorists by the so-called moderates? They "condemn" the terrorists' actions, but don't do anything about turning the bastards in for punishment. They put on a "we are appalled" act, but don't do much to help get rid of those who are killing even their own people. Amazing! The real action on the part of the Infidels is to eliminate or suppress totally ALL Islam followers. This is the only absolute way we will have freedom from their attacks. Frankly, they all are pretty smart cookies when it comes to pulling the wool over the eyes of the Infidels. We are suckers and will continue to be until every one of them changes to something other than Islam. What other than Christianity, I don't know; however, it must be something.

The questions of what to do that will assuredly make a difference as to how the problem is solved begs answers; however, one strong suggestion I have is to get rid of the mullahs, the imams and the ayatollahs who preach and who are the key persons in teaching hate, terrorism and destruction of the billions of Infidels (just a few million more than the billions of Muslims.) On average, the Muslim population is made up of rather simple, non-educated, primitive people. If the truth be known, relatively few even know what the Quran says. They haven't studied or read it on their own. The mullahs and Imams do the dirty work as far s teaching the masses what they want them to know -- or teach them how to act. And, most of the stuff taught the masses is "man-made", not Allah ordered (although he ordered some pretty bad stuff if you refer to the Quran.) No where in the Quran will you find instructions on how to strap layers of explosives around your body to blow up some innocents later on in the day -- when courage is worked up enough to pull the "trigger." The hadiths of Mohammad don't carry plans how to bring death and destruction to the Infidels -- although, the end result if strongly suggested. There are some strange actions he suggested, too, of course. The whole system of behavior and emulation is full of strange and "insane" stuff. Remarkably a lot of what you will find in the Quran is directly taken from the Bible.

A scenario that has crossed my mind at times is my picturing two entities (our God and their Allah) having conversations about what the creatures "below" are to do next, as suggested by one or the other. Of course, this is insane (I admit the scenario is near delusional. I know I'm not, for sure.) I have to really turn on my imagination to believe that there is Allah. Don't forget, Muhammad came up with the Islam belief some 600 years after the Biblical Jews and Jesus were long gone -- and it was an angel -- Gabriel -- who gave the word of Allah to Mohammad who was illiterate as all get out. He had others write what Gabriel was telling him what Allah was telling Gabriel! A lot of room for error in translation, wouldn't you say? According to the Muslims, though, every word in the Quran is absolutely the word of Allah -- who contradicted himself many times in telling what to write in the Quran. Isn't rationalization wonderful?

Regarding suggestions that would put the skids on most of the problems caused by Islam, here are a few -- some slightly new; however, repeats of those I gave (as have others) long ago. My philosophy regarding getting rid of a problem is to "cut off the head of the snake, and the snake will die." Here are a few head-cutting suggestions:

any mosque, Islamic meeting house or any organization that talks or condones or gives assistance to teach hate, violence or terrorist acts must immediately be shut down, and the leaders of the entity put in jail charged with treasonous acts against the United States.
Lobbyists and all "charity" groups that have anything to do with Islamofascists must be totally investigated regarding from where the funds to continue their activity come. Closed if necessary!
All Islamic study centers at colleges and universities are to be shut down to prevent the preaching of hate, proselyte, influencing or giving sanctuary to terrorists already in the country posing as students. (Tell Saudi Arabia to keep their blood money!)
Immunity laws should be passed to prevent suits against anyone who reports suspicious or overt actions by Muslims. No patriot should be endangered with a law suit for reporting suspicious activity.
(My favorite!) All mullahs and imams (or any leader) should be arrested and jailed for a long time for preaching anything like hate or opposition to the United States of America. There should be no probation offered -- only prison time, and mandatory at that. This group must be isolated from all others in prison and their "religious" garb should be confiscated. None of these jerks volunteer to get blown up while killing innocent people, even their own.
The Quran should be reviewed thoroughly and any parts of the book that encourages action against Infidels must be rebuked or revoked. Where there is conflict between the Quran and the Constitution of the United States of America, the conflict is to be settled in favor of the Constitution. If any imam, mullah or other type of leader balks at this action, they are to be deported with no possibility of ever being allowed in the United States again. (I should be President! with Executive Order privilege.)
Some would say that this latter is unconstitutional since there is freedom of religion. That's so; however, there is no freedom of "religion" when it encourages the destruction of the United States of America. The Quran does.

These have been mentioned before, and time again. Others have more appropriate suggestions, the repeating of which is not for me. Enough! God bless America and all her Patriots -- especially those who put their lives on the line to protect her.

TRYING TIMES

These are, indeed, trying times. I've written to more persons who are part of these times than ever in my life. I've written to mayors, governors, representatives (state level), representatives (federal level), Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, the President not once but quite a few times. I wrote letters to the Electoral College, individuals who were in position to "make a difference" and others whom I considered in position to carry my message. I've written to persons who are officers in large companies asking for their assistance, and to common, everyday citizens. Some of my words were contained in email messages, some in faxes and some in snail mail. I've written thousands of words to those who are on my Yahoo page, to those who belong to special groups and to all my family. I have written hundreds of pages of words -- and practically all of them on three main issues: illegal aliens, Islamofascists and politicians. Oh, once in a while I would send greetings suiting the day - Easter, Thanksgiving, Christmas and the New Year -- you know, the usual greetings and wishes types of words.

This said, I have to admit that I don't feel that I've made much difference in the world. I have received back many emails (never a fax, and only a few snail mail types), and practically all of those are written in agreement with me. However, it comes down to the fact that "I'm preaching to the choir." This scarcely gets much attention since the "choir" is a "captive audience" and not in any much better position to influence those who can change the situation that is so horrible. Once in a while, I get a nasty letter, often containing words that are not fit to repeat; but not often enough to make me feel "unwanted." I guarantee you that I slap back at those who write the nasty letters. I never was one to "ignore" the bastards. I feel they need back what they give, and I give. Why not? I don't want to give them the satisfaction of believing their saying something nasty causes me to give into them, so won't answer. What they give, they get back. Their nastiness takes away my wishing to be broad-minded and to honor different opinions. Just don't be nasty, and I'll listen. Be nasty and you go into the garbage heap!

The fact remains, though, that there are 545 people in charge of the rest of us, and I'm not sure that I can trust them -- especially some of them. They should be behind bars, doing time for the crimes they have committed. Naming names is even becoming dangerous. Without mentioning any, all I have to say to you is to "watch closely and pay attention, and you will soon have your list -- and it will be the same as mine." Those on it have been undercutting our wonderful country for years -- with no relief from them in sight. Why? Because there are so many more than before people who just don't give a damn. I'd like to take some by the neck and twist it until they saw that doing nothing is the same as agreeing with those who are on the list.

Still I can't really blame a pretty large group of them. They are victims of or results of what has been happening slowly but surely in our country. We've allowed people who have liberal or socialistic minds to be in charge of our young -- from K to 12 and on into post high school years. Take that terrorist Bill Ayers (one I can name) and his terrorist wife! This guy has a teaching position in a college, yet at one time was willing to and tried to blow up various buildings in America -- getting away with it due to holes in the law. His kind are all over in our schools, from high school through college and university. They are treasonous, but are allowed to the privilege of "free speech". They are using our freedoms against us. We are to accept them, because the Constitution says we must. Besides these types, there are those who are hacking away at our spiritual background -- trying to eliminate God from our lives, taking "In God we Trust" from our currency; trying to eliminate "under God" from our Pledge of Allegiance. They are minions of Satan in MY VIEW. We are allowing them, though. We are giving in. We've lost the art of saying "NO", and meaning it. We won't fight. We are wimps.

At present we are in throes regarding the eligibility of a man to be voted into being President of the United States of America. The United States Supreme Court is dragging heels to decide whether he meets the requirement of being a natural born citizen -- or as bad off as being an illegal alien. He is literally spitting in our face -- or in the faces of the nine appointed persons (for life) as he hides away his "proof" in the form of a Certified Birth Certificate (not Certification of a Live Birth document.) And, to prove that he got into such a position, count the number of dolts who voted for him, believing the liberal press rather than being positive that he was vetted properly to fill the position. Just who is this guy? Is he an American "natural born" citizen, an Indonesian, an English citizen, a naturalized citizen -- what? not who! Dollars to doughnuts the U.S. Supreme Court will put an okay stamp on him! They won't have guts enough to demand he produce the Certificate of Birth. If he is sworn into office, we may as well toss the Constitution out the door. It will mean nothing, because it is like "you can't be a little pregnant" -- either you are or you aren't. Either the Constitution is solid, or it can be shaken off its foundation.

We see signs of anarchy (but only very faintly) by observing that the law saying no one can cross our borders without legal reason or permission is broken. We have between 14 to 16 million who say, "Oh, yes, we can!" And worse, every baby they have on American soil becomes a solid "natural born" citizen, and eligible for all the indigenous citizens can pay for! They are the anchor babies, those whose tiny bodies control our whole country! They are citizens, and need to be cared for since they are not able to care for themselves. That they are automatically citizens being born in these States, wasn't the intent of the author of the article covering who will be citizens according to the 14th Amendment. His intent was that those children born of foreign parents retain the citizenship of his or her parents, and not take on our citizenship.

We are giving in to the Islam ideology/religion in subtle ways, but certain. We are providing them with foot washes so they can celebrate their "religion" as they wish. We even allow them to take the oath of office on the Quran -- the book that spells out that every Infidel convert to Islam or be killed. That's totally incompatible with our Constitution. We even saw our first protest marches within the last couple of weeks. They burned the American flag (which our Supreme Court says is "okay", since it falls under the heading of "freedom of speech".)

And now I'm at the end of my rant. I was going to make a New Year's resolution not to be so pessimistic; however, that is an impossible one to keep, so I rant. If any were offended, so be it. I do wish all who read my words a very Happy New Year! one in which they prosper, find health, keep it and enjoy a happy life. God bless all.

THE SITUATION AS IT IS

When I first began writing you, discussing my concerns about two external worries in our life, I highlighted two issues -- the problem of illegal aliens and the terrible danger from the ideology/religion, Islam. Because I began my writing when there was a sitting president with several years left of his administration, I didn't include the stench of politics in my email notes to you. Of course, the political issue had to be added to the list of dangers to our wonderful country because our Republic/democracy periodically votes for representatives according to the laws set down in our Constitution.

I hate to tell you that since that long ago time when I began my writing you, there hasn't been any improvement in the overall situation of our country. Actually, our situation has grown worse, much worse. And in large part the worsening is directly related to the stench of politics. As it is, we have a President-to-be character who, in MY VIEW, bodes serious danger to our Republic. We are on the slippery slope of demise -- and the incompetent person who was elected (or should I say who bought his way) into office may well be mostly to blame. It is in this month in which much of our future will get its direction -- and it looks very pessimistic.

Since when I began writing you, the costly problem of the illegal aliens hasn't improved at all. The problem will be worse when the new administration takes over the duty of "running the country". Already we see signs that those who are here illegally will be granted amnesty and will be added to the social problems we already face. Some say that their being added to our "legal" population will lessen the problem of their not paying taxes as they didn't when they were illegal. This is a lie. The many who are already using our tax money to "live the better life" in America will increase. The fact that they will be paying taxes won't help one bit. Actually, what will happen is that there will be more of the un-employable (no education or skills) who will apply for the benefits that will be opened up to them, their being "citizens". What really will happen is that we will add more to the dole than decrease those already on it. Don't let anyone -- especially a politician -- tell you otherwise. Amnesty granted to the illegal aliens will put an additional burden on indigenous citizens.

The news today tells you that the problems caused by the ideology/religion, Islam have not decreased. They are worse, by far. The fighting that is going on between Hamas and Israel is very serious. Israel is ready and able to take on the task of eliminating those who are lobbing rockets into Israel -- against all rules and agreements. This is the way of Islam. There will be no end to the conflict between Israel and the Islamic hordes. The goal of Islam is to rule the world, so we can expect to have them knocking on our door any time now. They already are demonstrating in the streets (Fort Lauderdale, Florida) against Israel's retaliation against Hamas. Whom are they fooling? Their real purpose is to put on an act for the United States -- to object to any assistance the U.S. may give to Israel. They are "warning" us. The United States has not asked Israel to stop their retaliation (as we have in the past), so in fact we are "approving" Israel's action. What right do we have to interfere with the actions of another country is my question. Israel has been the victim of the Islamists for years and years. They have every right to defend themselves. Should we be brought into a larger fracas, we may be victims of bio-warfare or a dirty atom bomb. If this happens, the country (probably Iran) will have to be taken out. We will have a war on our hands.

Regarding the person who by means that were anything but ethical managed to be elected President has designs on our government that will bring our demise closer in time than suspected. As it is, there is the high probability that he may not be allowed to take the oath of President. The U.S. Supreme Court may find that he is ineligible to take office because he is not a "natural born" citizen. There are unheard cases before the Court waiting review regarding this unanswered question. We stand a good chance of having a constitutional crisis. Who will be president if B. Hussein Obama is denied the office? Will Joe Biden take the position? Does the Constitution provide for such a situation as faces us? I don't think so. From MY VIEW, we are going to have a terrible situation occur. The Internet is overloaded with possibilities of "revolution" -- not good, for sure. We are a country divided, and ripe for more mischief by Islamofascists. Is there any question why I am pessimistic? Our liberal media hasn't given any space to the problem. They continue as if all is well on the political front, which it is not. Writing to our representatives is futile. I've not received one answer to the questions I pose. I've used email, fax and snail mail to get responses, but have received nothing. It is like writing to a black hole. Still, if I did receive an answer, it most likely would be a lie. So, maybe it's best not to have any more frustration added to the situation.

Happy New Year!