IS THERE A PATTERN OF SHOWING OUR REPUBLIC'S DEMISE?
Am I seeing a pattern here? I'm referring to various actions taken by B. Hussein Obama, some recently, some taken a while ago and some planned to be taken. Now, I don't want to suggest a conspiracy here, not by a long shot; however, I want to set out for viewing what I see as a pattern. But, also, I want you to know that I am biased, suspicious and quite upset by what I do see has happened, is happening and is promised to happen; therefore, evaluate my words carefully.
First, have you noticed how totally ignoring the Obama camp is regarding the many suits against Obama, the DNC and members of the DNC charging that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States? From what I know, some of these suits were denied full hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court; however, there are a couple still wending their way through process, still not acted on.
Despite these, the process of getting him inaugurated is going on as if everything about it is as smooth as glass, and issues that might upset it are cut through as a hot knife cuts through butter. And none of this is mentioned by the main stream media -- liberal or "conservative". So we have:
1. Total ignoring of the law that says Obama must prove he is a natural born citizen. He hasn't done anything of the kind. Why won't he?
2. Have you noticed how he appears to be making sure he maintains "control" (sort of "blackmail" control) of his Cabinet Members by picking those who have issues that are also serious and must be cleared before they are cleanly okayed for membership in his cabinet? Richardson pulled out of his nomination; Hillary is not eligible to be Secretary of State, still she is being vetted by the Senate to be -- even though she's had practically no experience doing what a Secretary of State does, she's being considered as having enough. Geithner should withdraw his name from consideration based on the fact that he has been shown to have unpaid taxes and interest thereon -- not a good example for a cabinet member to show to others who pay income tax -- or else.
All in all, far too many of those chosen to be cabinet members show to be guilty of or suspected guilty of breaking the laws of the land. Why aren't his Cabinet Members being picked more carefully? Doesn't he want a strong backing? How can a citizen of the U.S. feel comfortable being "governed" by those who have shown that they are "illegal" and have broken laws others are expected to obey? Perhaps Obama wants a less than strong cabinet so that he can influence them more to his agenda than take their advice and accept their assistance. Just a thought.
There's one special suit that has been filed against B. Hussein Obama giving me considerable satisfaction that he will have to respond to the demand he show his Birth Certificate. It is one covering his ineligibility to be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces. It was filed by a group of retired veterans who are subject to recall. They ask the simple question: Will they be tried for treason refusing to serve under an ineligible "Commander in Chief", since they have sworn to protect the Constitution of the United States, and the one who is supposed to be eligible to be CinC is, himself, ineligible to be that CinC?
Refusing to serve under such an ineligible one would be forcing them to carry out an act of treason. This is one suit working its way through the Supreme Court at present. When or if it will be heard in conference and declared in good standing for the Court to consider on its constitutionality merit is to be on the 23rd of January, this year -- after he is president! I haven't the slightest idea why this is the way it will be.
Sometimes, though I know our Constitution is one of the most beautiful documents of the world's collection, it is often made to appear to be very difficult to fathom. In MY VIEW its beautiful wording is so clear that anyone with average intelligence can understand it. Why does it take so long to rule that what it says is Constitutionally legal or not?
But then, we have two of the greatest opposites that brought us our form of government. The Declaration of Independence is one of the most liberal documents written; the Constitution is one of the most conservative -- and we need both to maintain the type of government we have. We are a Republic functioning as a democracy. We need both to balance in their connotations! We need to be a nation of laws, governed by representatives who function within them without deviation -- of, for and by!
Though we should never allow the democracy aspect to lord over the Republic aspect, I am afraid we have. We are moving from being a country ruled by laws into being a country ruled by people who appear to want to make laws as they wish to fit their "needs." Too many judges want to legislate! There are too many special interests influencing those who are supposed to represent "We the People".
There are other signs that disturb me; however, spelling them out serves no purpose. What do the "signs" point to, though? In MY VIEW, they point to a complete change of our form of government. I see it as heading toward the fascist type of government that has failed so many times in the past. This type of government is like the type controlling billions of people around the world. It is the type of government of Islam -- people are totally under the control of a select few -- in their case the imams, the mullahs and an ayatollah. We are heading in that direction, my friend, and I am concerned. Still I see no conspiracy.
Why is it going this way? from MY VIEW, there are several reasons; however the main one is because of the fracturing of the conservative groups. Instead of presenting a solid front to the liberals, we are presenting bits and pieces. We need to reorganize under one main powerhouse, and keep the pressure on liberality. In reality, America is a conservative country. It is only that we are fractionated that makes it appear that we are not. And, my friend, we must separate ourselves from apathy! We are being lulled to inaction by liberal media who dominate communication vehicles, TV, newspapers, etc. Does this tell us something? What say you? Do you see a pattern of demise?
W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.
Veritas vos Liberabit!
Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil!
First, have you noticed how totally ignoring the Obama camp is regarding the many suits against Obama, the DNC and members of the DNC charging that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States? From what I know, some of these suits were denied full hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court; however, there are a couple still wending their way through process, still not acted on.
Despite these, the process of getting him inaugurated is going on as if everything about it is as smooth as glass, and issues that might upset it are cut through as a hot knife cuts through butter. And none of this is mentioned by the main stream media -- liberal or "conservative". So we have:
1. Total ignoring of the law that says Obama must prove he is a natural born citizen. He hasn't done anything of the kind. Why won't he?
2. Have you noticed how he appears to be making sure he maintains "control" (sort of "blackmail" control) of his Cabinet Members by picking those who have issues that are also serious and must be cleared before they are cleanly okayed for membership in his cabinet? Richardson pulled out of his nomination; Hillary is not eligible to be Secretary of State, still she is being vetted by the Senate to be -- even though she's had practically no experience doing what a Secretary of State does, she's being considered as having enough. Geithner should withdraw his name from consideration based on the fact that he has been shown to have unpaid taxes and interest thereon -- not a good example for a cabinet member to show to others who pay income tax -- or else.
All in all, far too many of those chosen to be cabinet members show to be guilty of or suspected guilty of breaking the laws of the land. Why aren't his Cabinet Members being picked more carefully? Doesn't he want a strong backing? How can a citizen of the U.S. feel comfortable being "governed" by those who have shown that they are "illegal" and have broken laws others are expected to obey? Perhaps Obama wants a less than strong cabinet so that he can influence them more to his agenda than take their advice and accept their assistance. Just a thought.
There's one special suit that has been filed against B. Hussein Obama giving me considerable satisfaction that he will have to respond to the demand he show his Birth Certificate. It is one covering his ineligibility to be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces. It was filed by a group of retired veterans who are subject to recall. They ask the simple question: Will they be tried for treason refusing to serve under an ineligible "Commander in Chief", since they have sworn to protect the Constitution of the United States, and the one who is supposed to be eligible to be CinC is, himself, ineligible to be that CinC?
Refusing to serve under such an ineligible one would be forcing them to carry out an act of treason. This is one suit working its way through the Supreme Court at present. When or if it will be heard in conference and declared in good standing for the Court to consider on its constitutionality merit is to be on the 23rd of January, this year -- after he is president! I haven't the slightest idea why this is the way it will be.
Sometimes, though I know our Constitution is one of the most beautiful documents of the world's collection, it is often made to appear to be very difficult to fathom. In MY VIEW its beautiful wording is so clear that anyone with average intelligence can understand it. Why does it take so long to rule that what it says is Constitutionally legal or not?
But then, we have two of the greatest opposites that brought us our form of government. The Declaration of Independence is one of the most liberal documents written; the Constitution is one of the most conservative -- and we need both to maintain the type of government we have. We are a Republic functioning as a democracy. We need both to balance in their connotations! We need to be a nation of laws, governed by representatives who function within them without deviation -- of, for and by!
Though we should never allow the democracy aspect to lord over the Republic aspect, I am afraid we have. We are moving from being a country ruled by laws into being a country ruled by people who appear to want to make laws as they wish to fit their "needs." Too many judges want to legislate! There are too many special interests influencing those who are supposed to represent "We the People".
There are other signs that disturb me; however, spelling them out serves no purpose. What do the "signs" point to, though? In MY VIEW, they point to a complete change of our form of government. I see it as heading toward the fascist type of government that has failed so many times in the past. This type of government is like the type controlling billions of people around the world. It is the type of government of Islam -- people are totally under the control of a select few -- in their case the imams, the mullahs and an ayatollah. We are heading in that direction, my friend, and I am concerned. Still I see no conspiracy.
Why is it going this way? from MY VIEW, there are several reasons; however the main one is because of the fracturing of the conservative groups. Instead of presenting a solid front to the liberals, we are presenting bits and pieces. We need to reorganize under one main powerhouse, and keep the pressure on liberality. In reality, America is a conservative country. It is only that we are fractionated that makes it appear that we are not. And, my friend, we must separate ourselves from apathy! We are being lulled to inaction by liberal media who dominate communication vehicles, TV, newspapers, etc. Does this tell us something? What say you? Do you see a pattern of demise?
W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.
Veritas vos Liberabit!
Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil!
posted by Dr. Bill at 1:28 AM
.jpg)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home