SUGGESTIONS TO MAKE THINGS RIGHT
Dear Friend,
I wrote a novel some time ago. It was as popular as a politician whose aftershave lotion smells so bad it's evident its used to cover up what he promises. The idea was pretty good, though. The book fell into the category of "intrigue" -- a sort of adventure type of novel. The main theme was about getting rid of dictators and those who did more harm in the world than they ever did good -- stuff even a mother wouldn't defend -- real snakes. My thinking was that if you get rid of the head of the snake, the snake would soon die. And when they died, others would take a lesson from what happens to "snakes". They'd go the same way. Then, of course, I had to find some snakes whose head needed "cutting off". That was the easy part.
I didn't intend the assassinations it to be by shooting or by a bomb, but by a method that was clean, sure and impossible to stop once the process began. The method I planned to use was to have "my chemists" come up with a designer poison -- one that had an antidote to protect the assassins, but which would take too long to discover and then concoct to save the one being assassinated -- five days! I did a lot of research on poisons and antidotes; and especially the means by which to deliver the poison to the victim. The poison was to be delivered simply by crushing miniscule globules containing a small amount of the poison on the victim's skin -- any place on the body. And since the carrier was also a special chemical, the poison was absorbed into the skin nearly instantly. There are all sorts of medications administered by topical means. Just rub the stuff on and it goes to the heart of the problem -- usually! Check out the ads on these.
Why am I telling you this? Well, wouldn't it be a great idea to get rid of the "snakes" we know by cutting off their heads? And, aren't there a lot of "snakes" whose head needs cutting off? Or aren't there a lot of "bad ones" who need to be eliminated? and wouldn't such a simple thing as rubbing a poison on their skin be a cool way of getting rid of the "snake heads?" In the instance of a dictatorship, getting rid of the dictator is a good idea. In an oligarchy, getting rid of the key players is a good idea! Often, the only reason a type of government exists is because of the person(s) at the top. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, a few mullahs, some imams and an ayatollah or two are examples. That guy in Iran whose mind is some place other than where it should be would be a fine specimen on whom to try the technique. All that's needed is a person to put minuscule globules containing the poison on an assassin's hands, (he will already have taken the antidote to protect himself), then he simply shakes hands with the target devil. The poison would transfer from the assassin's hand to the target's hand and then be absorbed into his skin.
Five days later, the Iranians would be celebrating a funeral! And another would have to take the dead one's place. And if that one tried anything funny, let him shake hands with another assassin -- or have him delivered a dose of it some other way. I hope some one reads my book. I got rid of five real bastards pretty neatly. Assassins were easy to find -- money talks with loud words! In my novel, I arranged it so that all those I wanted out of the picture received their poison at the same mean time! Of course, all hell broke loose in the world -- at least in the novel, it did.
I've often thought that there ought be a committee chosen by a number of countries who would be judges of the leaders of each country; and if he or she were doing a bad job, one that was causing a lot of trouble for the people of his or her country, or another, a vote would be taken whether he or she should remain leader -- sort of a performance test. Eliminate the bad ones after evaluation. And, make the "punishment" a serious one -- like prison or relegation to a large island where they can't do any more harm. And if his or her performance was an abomination, the penalty would be death.
There would have to be a standard type of government, of course -- one that assured freedom and liberty. Our Constitution would be a good model. I don't know of any country it wouldn't fit pretty well. A little modification here and there might be needed, but all in all it would be fine. We might as well give ours to some other country. We're not using it very much lately. Which brings up the present situation. We have to do something about our present leader. He needs to be evaluated by the people more closely, and if his performance doesn't get better, and if he doesn't stop trying to make our country socialist, he's got to go -- anyone know of a good island? Impeach him firsts, of course!
I have an idea or two I'm going to put in an email when I get them cleaned" up some. I'm taking suggestions from a lot of those who write to me. You'll see a fairly wide variety of suggestions -- some pretty nasty, of course. I think it wise to leave them out. We don't want any sorrowful things happen. There is no need for them. A lot can be done without harm! We'll use the Aristotle oath: "Premum non Nocere!" Then, do what is necessary and reasonable.
What, in general, do you think? What say you? I've started the snowball down the slope. How large will it grow?
W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.
Veritas vos Liberabit!
Premum non Nocere! Then kill the terrorists!
P.S. Don't forget, part of this letter was prompted by a novel. I have no plans, for sure. Still, I think about those who were murdered on 9/11, on the Cole, in Bali, in Saudi Arabia, etc., etc. We are in Afghanistan doing a job on terrorists. We pretty well are finished in Iraq! What next?
B. A.
I wrote a novel some time ago. It was as popular as a politician whose aftershave lotion smells so bad it's evident its used to cover up what he promises. The idea was pretty good, though. The book fell into the category of "intrigue" -- a sort of adventure type of novel. The main theme was about getting rid of dictators and those who did more harm in the world than they ever did good -- stuff even a mother wouldn't defend -- real snakes. My thinking was that if you get rid of the head of the snake, the snake would soon die. And when they died, others would take a lesson from what happens to "snakes". They'd go the same way. Then, of course, I had to find some snakes whose head needed "cutting off". That was the easy part.
I didn't intend the assassinations it to be by shooting or by a bomb, but by a method that was clean, sure and impossible to stop once the process began. The method I planned to use was to have "my chemists" come up with a designer poison -- one that had an antidote to protect the assassins, but which would take too long to discover and then concoct to save the one being assassinated -- five days! I did a lot of research on poisons and antidotes; and especially the means by which to deliver the poison to the victim. The poison was to be delivered simply by crushing miniscule globules containing a small amount of the poison on the victim's skin -- any place on the body. And since the carrier was also a special chemical, the poison was absorbed into the skin nearly instantly. There are all sorts of medications administered by topical means. Just rub the stuff on and it goes to the heart of the problem -- usually! Check out the ads on these.
Why am I telling you this? Well, wouldn't it be a great idea to get rid of the "snakes" we know by cutting off their heads? And, aren't there a lot of "snakes" whose head needs cutting off? Or aren't there a lot of "bad ones" who need to be eliminated? and wouldn't such a simple thing as rubbing a poison on their skin be a cool way of getting rid of the "snake heads?" In the instance of a dictatorship, getting rid of the dictator is a good idea. In an oligarchy, getting rid of the key players is a good idea! Often, the only reason a type of government exists is because of the person(s) at the top. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, a few mullahs, some imams and an ayatollah or two are examples. That guy in Iran whose mind is some place other than where it should be would be a fine specimen on whom to try the technique. All that's needed is a person to put minuscule globules containing the poison on an assassin's hands, (he will already have taken the antidote to protect himself), then he simply shakes hands with the target devil. The poison would transfer from the assassin's hand to the target's hand and then be absorbed into his skin.
Five days later, the Iranians would be celebrating a funeral! And another would have to take the dead one's place. And if that one tried anything funny, let him shake hands with another assassin -- or have him delivered a dose of it some other way. I hope some one reads my book. I got rid of five real bastards pretty neatly. Assassins were easy to find -- money talks with loud words! In my novel, I arranged it so that all those I wanted out of the picture received their poison at the same mean time! Of course, all hell broke loose in the world -- at least in the novel, it did.
I've often thought that there ought be a committee chosen by a number of countries who would be judges of the leaders of each country; and if he or she were doing a bad job, one that was causing a lot of trouble for the people of his or her country, or another, a vote would be taken whether he or she should remain leader -- sort of a performance test. Eliminate the bad ones after evaluation. And, make the "punishment" a serious one -- like prison or relegation to a large island where they can't do any more harm. And if his or her performance was an abomination, the penalty would be death.
There would have to be a standard type of government, of course -- one that assured freedom and liberty. Our Constitution would be a good model. I don't know of any country it wouldn't fit pretty well. A little modification here and there might be needed, but all in all it would be fine. We might as well give ours to some other country. We're not using it very much lately. Which brings up the present situation. We have to do something about our present leader. He needs to be evaluated by the people more closely, and if his performance doesn't get better, and if he doesn't stop trying to make our country socialist, he's got to go -- anyone know of a good island? Impeach him firsts, of course!
I have an idea or two I'm going to put in an email when I get them cleaned" up some. I'm taking suggestions from a lot of those who write to me. You'll see a fairly wide variety of suggestions -- some pretty nasty, of course. I think it wise to leave them out. We don't want any sorrowful things happen. There is no need for them. A lot can be done without harm! We'll use the Aristotle oath: "Premum non Nocere!" Then, do what is necessary and reasonable.
What, in general, do you think? What say you? I've started the snowball down the slope. How large will it grow?
W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.
Veritas vos Liberabit!
Premum non Nocere! Then kill the terrorists!
P.S. Don't forget, part of this letter was prompted by a novel. I have no plans, for sure. Still, I think about those who were murdered on 9/11, on the Cole, in Bali, in Saudi Arabia, etc., etc. We are in Afghanistan doing a job on terrorists. We pretty well are finished in Iraq! What next?
B. A.
posted by Dr. Bill at 5:45 PM
.jpg)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home