U.S. SUPREME COURT GUILTY OF CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
All the while since I knew of our CONSTITUTION and how wonderful it was, I had such a respect for it and for those who took a solemn oath to protect it for their lifetime. I had such respect for the nine persons who were its keeper -- and felt that our country was safe as long as they kept it from being despoiled in any way.
It appears I have wasted my time and my supply of respect. Even the justices of the u. s. supreme court have destroyed my faith in man. It is not the Constitution's words that make me feel this way; it is those who interpret them. In MY VIEW they don't believe them, nor pay attention to them any more than the weakest or worst of judges in the field. The u.s. supreme court justices ignore the Constitution!
On January 14, 2009, B. Hussein Obama and Joe Biden, at the invitation of Chief Justice John Roberts, paid a visit to the quarters of the U.S. Supreme Court. There in secrecy, they spent the better part of an hour talking (about what?) Eight Justices were present. Justice Alito was absent -- presumably on duty hearing arguments, it is supposed.
If ever there was a conflict of interest, in this instance, this one would be the epitome of them all! These justices were meeting with a man whose eligibility to be president of the United States was under question and suits filed saying so were in their possession! They knew of this, yet still were meeting with the subject who was to be of their concern!
Lynn Stuter (January 20, 2009 - NewsWithViews.com) says: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter139.htm
"According to an Associated Press release, written by Mark Sherman,
'When employees glimpsed Obama on his way out, a loud cheer went up in a building that exudes decorum.'
Can one surmise the Supreme Court ecstatic over the illegitimate ascendancy of [Obama] to the presidency of the United States, thus driving a stake through the heart of the United States Constitution?
The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom [Obama] and Biden met."
According to my understanding of what is lawful, there should never be a conflict of interest in the search for fairness, truth and unequivocal justice . How can there not be prejudice or the smell of prevarication in such instances as conflicts of interest. There is always the chance of putting a halo over the head of one or the other of anyone appearing before a court seeking a fair trial and justice.
Stuter goes on:
"Judges are to refrain from appearances of impropriety and partiality; from engaging in activities that compromise the mandate of an independent judiciary.
According to the AP piece,
"Eight years ago, President George W. Bush did not visit the court before he took office, but the circumstances were — to put it mildly — unusual.
In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."
The circumstances surrounding [Obama] are just as "unusual", considering the question of eligibility because of his refusal to produce the one document that would prove (or disprove) his eligibility to the office of president — his long form vault copy Hawaii birth certificate — a document that can be obtained for a mere $12.50."
It gets worse! Dr. Orly Tietz, D.D.S, Attorney at Law, in correspondence with Chief Justice John Roberts petitioned that no Justice from the Court swear in Obama as president because of the conflict of interest issue. Her petition was ignored. The full Court are to be in conference on January 23, 2009 to decide whether the suit against Obama, et al will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court as to his eligibility to be president -- and to demand proof if necessary that Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States.
If the court is this involved with this man Obama, in what vein can I or anyone of sentiency think of their hearing the case without prejudice or bias? Justice Roberts' action, from MY VIEW is ignoring the Constitution, and he is "making up the law" as he goes along. He should have reclused himself, and instructed his colleagues to do the same. It isn't necessary for any Justice the Supreme Court to administer the oath (which, by the way, should be done over because the wording wasn't exactly as they should be.)
It may not be unconstitutional to be "guilty" of conflict of interests; however, the impropriety engaged in by the Chief Justice, is shameful. It is all the same as saying, "I've already made up my mind, so don't bother me with the facts." The Justices have shown disrespect for the Constitution by ignoring connotations derived from its demand that there be justice and fairness. Have they made up their minds already? I wonder. Will they say that the conference on a suit to be held January 23,2009 has no standing? It will be interesting to know.
I am so disgusted with the whole thing that I feel we are dealing with a bunch of morons -- and they are all under the spell of an evil person. We, as a nation, have been duped, and some have been more than others. Enough said. Our country is in dire straits and in serious danger. Be afraid, my friend, be very afraid; and be prepared.
W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.Veritas vos Liberabit!Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil! (Especially evil.)
It appears I have wasted my time and my supply of respect. Even the justices of the u. s. supreme court have destroyed my faith in man. It is not the Constitution's words that make me feel this way; it is those who interpret them. In MY VIEW they don't believe them, nor pay attention to them any more than the weakest or worst of judges in the field. The u.s. supreme court justices ignore the Constitution!
On January 14, 2009, B. Hussein Obama and Joe Biden, at the invitation of Chief Justice John Roberts, paid a visit to the quarters of the U.S. Supreme Court. There in secrecy, they spent the better part of an hour talking (about what?) Eight Justices were present. Justice Alito was absent -- presumably on duty hearing arguments, it is supposed.
If ever there was a conflict of interest, in this instance, this one would be the epitome of them all! These justices were meeting with a man whose eligibility to be president of the United States was under question and suits filed saying so were in their possession! They knew of this, yet still were meeting with the subject who was to be of their concern!
Lynn Stuter (January 20, 2009 - NewsWithViews.com) says: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter139.htm
"According to an Associated Press release, written by Mark Sherman,
'When employees glimpsed Obama on his way out, a loud cheer went up in a building that exudes decorum.'
Can one surmise the Supreme Court ecstatic over the illegitimate ascendancy of [Obama] to the presidency of the United States, thus driving a stake through the heart of the United States Constitution?
The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom [Obama] and Biden met."
According to my understanding of what is lawful, there should never be a conflict of interest in the search for fairness, truth and unequivocal justice . How can there not be prejudice or the smell of prevarication in such instances as conflicts of interest. There is always the chance of putting a halo over the head of one or the other of anyone appearing before a court seeking a fair trial and justice.
Stuter goes on:
"Judges are to refrain from appearances of impropriety and partiality; from engaging in activities that compromise the mandate of an independent judiciary.
According to the AP piece,
"Eight years ago, President George W. Bush did not visit the court before he took office, but the circumstances were — to put it mildly — unusual.
In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."
The circumstances surrounding [Obama] are just as "unusual", considering the question of eligibility because of his refusal to produce the one document that would prove (or disprove) his eligibility to the office of president — his long form vault copy Hawaii birth certificate — a document that can be obtained for a mere $12.50."
It gets worse! Dr. Orly Tietz, D.D.S, Attorney at Law, in correspondence with Chief Justice John Roberts petitioned that no Justice from the Court swear in Obama as president because of the conflict of interest issue. Her petition was ignored. The full Court are to be in conference on January 23, 2009 to decide whether the suit against Obama, et al will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court as to his eligibility to be president -- and to demand proof if necessary that Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States.
If the court is this involved with this man Obama, in what vein can I or anyone of sentiency think of their hearing the case without prejudice or bias? Justice Roberts' action, from MY VIEW is ignoring the Constitution, and he is "making up the law" as he goes along. He should have reclused himself, and instructed his colleagues to do the same. It isn't necessary for any Justice the Supreme Court to administer the oath (which, by the way, should be done over because the wording wasn't exactly as they should be.)
It may not be unconstitutional to be "guilty" of conflict of interests; however, the impropriety engaged in by the Chief Justice, is shameful. It is all the same as saying, "I've already made up my mind, so don't bother me with the facts." The Justices have shown disrespect for the Constitution by ignoring connotations derived from its demand that there be justice and fairness. Have they made up their minds already? I wonder. Will they say that the conference on a suit to be held January 23,2009 has no standing? It will be interesting to know.
I am so disgusted with the whole thing that I feel we are dealing with a bunch of morons -- and they are all under the spell of an evil person. We, as a nation, have been duped, and some have been more than others. Enough said. Our country is in dire straits and in serious danger. Be afraid, my friend, be very afraid; and be prepared.
W. S. Arnott, Ph.D.Veritas vos Liberabit!Premum non Nocere! Then eviscerate evil! (Especially evil.)
posted by Dr. Bill at 7:42 PM
.jpg)
1 Comments:
Dear Fellow citizens,
what can we do to to insist the facts be proven? have we given up our constitution in the name of some hollywood produced character of American Idol? There are other cases still pending , Keyes vs Obama .I thought Justice Alito did not show up because he was protesting this meeting. I heard that the Arabs own 70% of the News Corp in America, and that Obamas education was funded by some Arab Prince. This was told by former Bourough President of Manhattan Percy Sutton on channel 1 news on Time Warner Cable when asked by interviewer Dominic Carter, When did he first hear about Obama? Sutton said a Lawyer for an unnamed Saudi Prince asked Percy Sutton to write a letter of recommendation to Harvard for Obamas admittance. However Obama still refuses to release any college records . We do not even know if this guy is acually a lawyer . No American or Congressmember or Senator has admitted to ever seeing any of his college degrees. This is one huge disgrace to this Nation Iam ready to protest the Supreme court to take action and demand the proof of citizenship. His first actions in office prove to me his alligaence is with the Arab world . ex. sopping the trails in Guantanimo, His first and only TV interview ARAB NEWS international abortions . He wants to change the military code of honor to pledge to him instead of pledging to the Constitution. There is also a case against him from a retired Military General who states that if Obama is an illegitmate President he cannot uphold his Miltary committment in case he is called back to duty . i am starting to think that all these people who have refused to verify his citizenship status are being blackmailed or bribed. All we ask for is the truth. Obama has done everything he can to stop the truth .Just as you feel my last hope is with the US SUPREME COURT .Why are they delaying this is beyond comprehension. It is heartbreaking to see our elected officials ignoring these very simple facts. They may very well be responsible for destroying our US Constitution. That meeting with Obama Biden and the 8 justices seems illeagal at the least unethical. Do they not care about the future of this Country for even their own children?
Tee Cee
Post a Comment
<< Home